Re: calling.scm

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Klaus Schilling <address@hidden> writes:

> I don't understand yet what the functions in calling.scm
> are supposed to do, thus can't fix it, and the comments in 
> calling.scm are too vague, and the guilr-ref refuses
> to document them.

Given their name, I vaguely understand what they're supposed to do, but
I think they're not used much (not at all?), as evidenced by your
report.  We might want to just remove it in 1.9.  Unless you provide a
patch?  :-)

Thanks,
Ludovic.