Re: Problem with smobs

[Joris van der Hoeven]

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:26:22PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> "Mikael Djurfeldt" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On 5/30/06, Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> > In this case my guess is that some reference to your smob remains on
> >> > the stack or in some data structure associated with printing (like the
> >> > print-state) immediately after printing.  That reference will very
> >> > likely pretty soon disappear after some further execution.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >> So I still would call this an undocument side-effect of "display".
> >> How much precisely is kept on the stack or in print-states?
> >
> > I don't remember. You'll have to look it up in the source code or wait
> > for a reply from someone else.
> 
> In any case this bug is fixed now in 1.8 CVS, and in the 1.6.8
> release.  Does that help you?

Sure; thank you all for the fast feedback. --Joris