[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Exposing common type wrapping/unwrapping methods
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Exposing common type wrapping/unwrapping methods |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:38:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Obviously, the best solution would be to expose the relevant functions
>> to the user. :-)
>
> Yes, we should do that, following the scm_to and scm_from naming scheme.
Following this discussion, I propose the following addition which
exposes the wrapping/unwrapping functions of `sockaddr' objects.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
2005-06-14 Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
* socket.c (scm_addr_vector): Renamed to `_scm_from_sockaddr'
and made inline.
(scm_from_sockaddr): New function.
(scm_to_sockaddr): New function.
(scm_fill_sockaddr): Made inline.
* socket.h (scm_from_sockaddr): New declaration.
(scm_to_sockaddr): New declaration.
Index: socket.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/guile/guile/guile-core/libguile/socket.c,v
retrieving revision 1.114
diff -u -B -b -r1.114 socket.c
--- socket.c 5 Jun 2005 18:27:53 -0000 1.114
+++ socket.c 14 Jun 2005 16:26:51 -0000
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@
proc is the name of the original procedure.
size returns the size of the structure allocated. */
-static struct sockaddr *
+static SCM_C_INLINE_KEYWORD struct sockaddr *
scm_fill_sockaddr (int fam, SCM address, SCM *args, int which_arg,
const char *proc, int *size)
#define FUNC_NAME proc
@@ -769,6 +769,22 @@
}
#undef FUNC_NAME
+/* Return a newly-allocated `sockaddr' structure that reflects ADDRESS, being
+ an address of family FAMILY, with the family-specific parameters ARGS (see
+ the description of `connect' for details). The returned structure may be
+ freed using `free ()'. */
+struct sockaddr *
+scm_to_sockaddr (int family, SCM address, SCM args)
+{
+ size_t size;
+ struct sockaddr *soka;
+
+ soka = scm_fill_sockaddr (family, address, &args, 1,
+ "scm_to_sockaddr", &size);
+
+ return soka;
+}
+
SCM_DEFINE (scm_connect, "connect", 3, 0, 1,
(SCM sock, SCM fam, SCM address, SCM args),
"Initiate a connection from a socket using a specified address\n"
@@ -893,8 +909,8 @@
#undef FUNC_NAME
/* Put the components of a sockaddr into a new SCM vector. */
-static SCM
-scm_addr_vector (const struct sockaddr *address, int addr_size,
+static SCM_C_INLINE_KEYWORD SCM
+_scm_from_sockaddr (const struct sockaddr *address, unsigned addr_size,
const char *proc)
{
short int fam = address->sa_family;
@@ -953,8 +969,10 @@
break;
#endif
default:
+ result = SCM_UNSPECIFIED;
scm_misc_error (proc, "Unrecognised address family: ~A",
scm_list_1 (scm_from_int (fam)));
+
}
return result;
}
@@ -959,6 +977,14 @@
return result;
}
+/* The publicly-visible function. Return a Scheme object representing
+ ADDRESS, an address of ADDR_SIZE bytes. */
+SCM
+scm_from_sockaddr (const struct sockaddr *address, unsigned addr_size)
+{
+ return (_scm_from_sockaddr (address, addr_size, "scm_from_sockaddr"));
+}
+
/* calculate the size of a buffer large enough to hold any supported
sockaddr type. if the buffer isn't large enough, certain system
calls will return a truncated address. */
@@ -1009,7 +1035,7 @@
if (newfd == -1)
SCM_SYSERROR;
newsock = SCM_SOCK_FD_TO_PORT (newfd);
- address = scm_addr_vector (addr, addr_size, FUNC_NAME);
+ address = _scm_from_sockaddr (addr, addr_size, FUNC_NAME);
return scm_cons (newsock, address);
}
#undef FUNC_NAME
@@ -1031,7 +1057,7 @@
fd = SCM_FPORT_FDES (sock);
if (getsockname (fd, addr, &addr_size) == -1)
SCM_SYSERROR;
- return scm_addr_vector (addr, addr_size, FUNC_NAME);
+ return _scm_from_sockaddr (addr, addr_size, FUNC_NAME);
}
#undef FUNC_NAME
@@ -1053,7 +1079,7 @@
fd = SCM_FPORT_FDES (sock);
if (getpeername (fd, addr, &addr_size) == -1)
SCM_SYSERROR;
- return scm_addr_vector (addr, addr_size, FUNC_NAME);
+ return _scm_from_sockaddr (addr, addr_size, FUNC_NAME);
}
#undef FUNC_NAME
@@ -1207,7 +1233,7 @@
if (rv == -1)
SCM_SYSERROR;
if (addr->sa_family != AF_UNSPEC)
- address = scm_addr_vector (addr, addr_size, FUNC_NAME);
+ address = _scm_from_sockaddr (addr, addr_size, FUNC_NAME);
else
address = SCM_BOOL_F;
Index: socket.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/guile/guile/guile-core/libguile/socket.h,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -B -b -r1.17 socket.h
--- socket.h 23 May 2005 19:57:21 -0000 1.17
+++ socket.h 14 Jun 2005 16:26:51 -0000
@@ -54,6 +54,11 @@
SCM_API SCM scm_sendto (SCM sockfd, SCM message, SCM fam, SCM address, SCM
args_and_flags);
SCM_API void scm_init_socket (void);
+struct sockaddr;
+SCM_API SCM scm_from_sockaddr (const struct sockaddr *address,
+ unsigned addr_size);
+SCM_API struct sockaddr *scm_to_sockaddr (int family, SCM address, SCM args);
+
#endif /* SCM_SOCKET_H */
/*
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Exposing common type wrapping/unwrapping methods,
Ludovic Courtès <=