[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCM_LENGTH ???
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: SCM_LENGTH ??? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:33:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
> Speaking of SCM_STRING_LENGTH, things like that which have been macros
> in the past should remain as macros, not functions, even if all it
> does is a function call.
>
> Changing from macro to function for instance broke guile-gtk. It was
> #ifdef testing for SCM_STRING_LENGTH to know to use that (in 1.6), as
> opposed to SCM_LENGTH (in whatever dim dark past).
Yes, you are right! Thanks for reminding me, I will go thru all
deprecated things and make sure that macros stay macros.
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Bruce Korb, 2005/01/07
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Marius Vollmer, 2005/01/07
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Bruce Korb, 2005/01/07
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Marius Vollmer, 2005/01/10
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Bruce Korb, 2005/01/10
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Greg Troxel, 2005/01/10
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Marius Vollmer, 2005/01/11
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Kevin Ryde, 2005/01/11
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Ken Raeburn, 2005/01/10
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Bruce Korb, 2005/01/11
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Marius Vollmer, 2005/01/11