[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GC ??
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
Re: GC ?? |
Date: |
03 Dec 2003 12:45:42 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
> The garbage collector only scans the Scheme heap and the C/Scheme
> stack, but neither the global C data nor the C heap.
Given this, do C functions that use SCM objects and presumably might
call GC at some point need to declare their SCM variables volatile?
--
Stephen Compall or s11 or sirian
brain-damaged, generalization of "Honeywell Brain Damage" (HBD), a
theoretical disease invented to explain certain utter cretinisms in
Multics, adj:
Obviously wrong; cretinous; demented. There is an implication
that the person responsible must have suffered brain damage,
because he/she should have known better. Calling something
brain-damaged is bad; it also implies it is unusable.
SAFE Adriatic Etacs Panama Baranyi quarter Kosovo SDI hackers
investigation national information infrastructure Comirex bomb
Chobetsu warfare
- GC ??, dv . praveen, 2003/12/02
- Re: GC ??, dv . praveen, 2003/12/03
- Re: GC ??, Matthias Koeppe, 2003/12/03
- Re: GC ??,
Stephen Compall <=
- Re: GC ??, Ludovic Courtès, 2003/12/03
- Re: GC ??, Matthias Koeppe, 2003/12/03
- Re: GC ??, Andreas Rottmann, 2003/12/03
- Re: GC ??, dv . praveen, 2003/12/03