[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:02:44 -0500 |
From: Tom Lord <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
I believe I said they were similar, not different -- so I'm not sure
why you ask me why they are different.
i was confused. ignore.
can we be fast and
convenient at the same time?
what is your take on this question?
> at the bottom it's all just fixed-width NANDs and NORs
> (logically speaking)...
What's your point? I don't see how that observation relates to
choices in language or run-time system design.
it doesn't. let's just call it a Bill Richter moment.
Are you off your meds?
probably. back to lurking now.
thi
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Dale P. Smith, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, rm, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Robert Marlow, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Harri Haataja, 2003/10/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord <address@hidden> To, 2003/10/27
- Message not available
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/27