[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scheme translator
From: |
Thamer Al-Harbash |
Subject: |
Re: Scheme translator |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:15:14 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Dale P. Smith wrote:
> I dunno. I think it would be great to have python->guile
> translator/compiler, but I think it would be better to invest that time
> and energy into a guile->C or guile->asm compiler.
Wasn't it one of the original plans to have "everything" to guile
compilers so that guile could be the one true extension library?
If such a project gets started, I'd be willing to contribute to
it as best I could. Unfortunately it's beyond the scope of my
pain receptors and my current skill set to design and write the
initial code base. Still something worth doing which I would
support.
--
Thamer Al-Harbash
GPG Key fingerprint: D7F3 1E3B F329 8DD5 FAE3 03B1 A663 E359 D686 AA1F
"to understand recursion first one must understand recursion"
- Scheme translator, Daniel Silva, 2003/08/12
- Re: Scheme translator, Neil Jerram, 2003/08/12
- Re: Scheme translator, Dale P. Smith, 2003/08/12
- Re: Scheme translator, Daniel Silva, 2003/08/12
- Re: Scheme translator, Neil Jerram, 2003/08/12
- Re: Scheme translator, Dale P. Smith, 2003/08/13
- Re: Scheme translator, Nic, 2003/08/13
- Re: Scheme translator,
Thamer Al-Harbash <=
- Re: Scheme translator, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/08/13
Re: Scheme translator, Joshua Judson Rosen, 2003/08/12