[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile -s is it necessary?
From: |
Joshua Judson Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: guile -s is it necessary? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Oct 2002 17:11:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:07:56AM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
>
> > Is there any particular reason (besides of higher symmetry)
> > you have to invoke a script as ``guile -s <script name>''
> > instead of just ``guile <script name>''?
>
> I don't know of any. Allowing "guile <script name>" seems very
> natural and rhymes with Perl, Python, Sh, and probably others.
And it'll let me use "#!/usr/bin/env guile" at the top of my scripts :)
--
"Great, I'm talking to a mathmetical symbol. I'm staying away from
the week old pizza served across the street." --Kane, TCD
pgpocjyxXjKYs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: guile -s is it necessary?, (continued)
Re: guile -s is it necessary?,
Joshua Judson Rosen <=
Re: guile -s is it necessary?, Paul Jarc, 2002/10/19