[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Threads and asyncs
|
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
|
Subject: |
Re: Threads and asyncs |
|
Date: |
02 Sep 2002 18:13:52 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> Common Lisp and Emacs Lisp have SCM's behavior.
No, Common Lisp and Emacs Lisp have (eq '() nil) -> t.
> A while back I tried to flame the current guile developers into
> submission on this point, but they are resiliant against such attacks.
> The "restart old fights" bit is in reference to that flame war -- it's
> just me obsequiously mentioning the design issue in a hopefully
> neutral way.
Perhaps they didn't submit, but rather actually *agreed* with the R5RS
editors.
Or is that just totally impossible??
- Threads and asyncs, Marius Vollmer, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Rob Browning, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Rob Browning, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/09/02
- RnRS process/history/documentation (was Re: Threads and asyncs), Lynn Winebarger, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/02
Re: Threads and asyncs, Marius Vollmer, 2002/09/03