Re: SCM_RECKLESS

[Marius Vollmer]

Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

> as with MEMOIZE_LOCALS, I also assume that all uses of the macro
> SCM_RECKLESS can be safely removed:  Setting SCM_RECKLESS to true will
> result in compiler errors.  Since noone has reported such errors yet, I
> believe it is safe to assume that nobody uses that macro.  This means that
> we can get rid of the macro and thus clean up the code by removing lots of
> #ifdefs and avoid to maintain unused code in the future.

Agreed.