[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MEMOIZE_LOCALS (fwd)
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: MEMOIZE_LOCALS (fwd) |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:51:45 -0700 |
From: Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:24:56 +0200 (CEST)
I posted this to the guile-devel list, but I think it could be of
interest to people on the guile-user list as well. So far, I have
got positive feedback from Marius for the change indicated below.
Thus, I urge people who disagree to this change to speak up.
Otherwise I will go ahead and remove the MEMOIZE_LOCALS macro.
this is a good opportunity to put in place performance testing framework
so we can see what kind of impact changes like this have. you can make
statements like "benchmarks/memoize-locals.test shows 3% degradation w/
this change in local testing". people can then learn to judge whether
or not such a change is under their noise threshold, and over time learn
to trust your methods. any plans to do this?
nice work on evaluation.text, btw.
thi