[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What if Guile changed its license to be LGPL?
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: What if Guile changed its license to be LGPL? |
Date: |
06 Jun 2002 01:31:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Per Bothner <address@hidden> writes:
> > If such a library exists, we are settled and can use GMP
> > exclusively, no? Anyone wanting to invoke the exception in
> > Guile's license can use the unrestricted substitute-GMP, right?
>
> However, the alternative implementation is probably not something
> the FSF wants to promote or even mention.
Heh, but they would consider letting anyone use GMP indirectly without
honoring the LGPL?
> Again, I suggest you check with RMS and Torbjörn to see what their
> positions are on the issue.
Yes, will do so tomorrow.
Re: What if Guile changed its license to be LGPL?, Neil Jerram, 2002/06/05
Re: What if Guile changed its license to be LGPL?, Dale P. Smith, 2002/06/05