[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x"
From: |
Kyle Cronan |
Subject: |
Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x" |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:06:55 -0500 (CDT) |
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Chris Cramer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:33:54AM -0400, Keith Wright wrote:
> > Boy are you asking for flamage. Ask again when you are ready for
> > a quiz on pages 581-608 of Common Lisp: The Language
> > by Guy L. Steele Jr. (Digital Press)
>
> Could you summarize for those of us who are not as familiar with Common
> Lisp? I have no idea what problems there could be with using something
> like printf with Lisp. Not that it's a burning desire of mine, since we
> already have format, but now you've got me wondering.
I'll leave Keith to comment on your specific question, but I thought I
would point out that the book he referred to is available online at this
URL (among others):
http://www.supelec.fr/docs/cltl/cltl2.html
I believe the chapter you want is number 27, "Pretty Printing".
Regards,
Kyle Cronan
<address@hidden>
- format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Steve Tell, 2001/10/15
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Per Bothner, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Keith Wright, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Chris Cramer, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x",
Kyle Cronan <=
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Dale P. Smith, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Steve Tell, 2001/10/17
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Martin Grabmueller, 2001/10/18
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/26
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Keith Wright, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Keith Wright, 2001/10/16