Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set

guile-user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?

From:	Klaus Schilling
Subject:	Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:32:26 +0200

Sam Tregar writes:
 > Would any Scheme users actually program anything in Perl?  I can almost
 > imagine Python, but Perl?

there are more jobs involving perl, and almost none involving scheme,
so most schemers are forced into programming in different languages
for a living.


Klaus Schilling

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, (continued)
- Re: No gh_set_x()?, Dirk Esser, 2001/07/13
- Re: No gh_set_x()?, Steven G. Johnson, 2001/07/16

Prev by Date: Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?
Next by Date: Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?
Previous by thread: Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?
Next by thread: Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread