[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No gh_set_x()?
From: |
Sam Tregar |
Subject: |
Re: No gh_set_x()? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:41:46 -0400 (EDT) |
On 10 Jul 2001, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> Well, it already worked for me. But I don't think Mr. Wall has the
> capacity _left_ for nausea over bad ideas. I mean, have you seen the
> "Apocalypse" language design plans for Perl 6?
Have I seen it? I contributed (a very little bit) to it! I love it now
and it's going to get much better. He hasn't gotten to the really good
stuff yet.
> What a waste -- taking a lovely little Lisp dialect and turning it
> into APL. B-)
Hee hee. You arrogant lispers... I'll teach you a lesson. Pretty soon
any Perl programmer will be able to use as much Scheme in their programs
as they want! Will you be able to say the same? Not likely!
Yes, I fully realize I'm probably the only person in the world that thinks
this is a great idea. Humor me.
> As confusing and irregular as Perl is, though, it's nowhere near as
> complex as English. And there are -plenty- of natural language
> recognitions systems written in Scheme. So my guess is that if
> *anything* besides perl can parse Perl, Guile can. B-)
Well, perl is written in C. By that logic, C can parse Perl. All I'll
say is good luck to you if you try. Come visit me when the sanitarium
lets you out for a weekend.
-sam
Re: No gh_set_x()?, Brett Viren, 2001/07/10
- Re: No gh_set_x()?, Sam Tregar, 2001/07/10
- Re: No gh_set_x()?, Brett Viren, 2001/07/10
- Re: No gh_set_x()?, Sam Tregar, 2001/07/10
- Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Sam Tregar, 2001/07/12
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Sam Tregar, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/13