[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?
From: |
Ken Fox |
Subject: |
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2001 11:43:57 -0400 (EDT) |
Sam Tregar writes:
> On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jeff Read wrote:
> > ... everybody and their brother (even the Perl and Python
> > guys) are rallying behind .NET as THE cross-platform,
> > language-agnostic development solution. ...
>
> Perl 6, at least, isn't wedded to any particular platform. The
> architecture is being designed to allow for pluggable backends ...
I would say it more strongly. There is absolutely no chance that
Perl 6 will be tied to .NET for anything. It would be a huge
mistake to build something that only works on .NET. (I thought we
learned this back in the 60's!)
- Ken
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, (continued)
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jeff Read, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?,
Ken Fox <=
- Message not available
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jeff Read, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jürgen A. Erhard, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/12
- more on continuations, Bill Schottstaedt, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/13
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/14