[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:27:43 +0100 (MET) |
> From: Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden>
> I've added the following comment at the top of the file:
>
> ;;; Modified by Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden> according
> ;;; to the ChangeLog distributed in the same directory as this file:
> ;;; 1997-08-19, 1997-09-03, 1997-09-10, 2000-08-13, 2000-08-24,
> ;;; 2000-09-12, 2001-03-08
Wouldn't it even fulfill the idea of the license to include a sentence
like "Modified according to the ChangeLog distributed in the same
directory as this file." ? IMO, either referencing the Changelog isn't
valid, then your solution above wouldn't help either, otherwise it
wouldn't be necessary to duplicate the information from it.
Best regards,
Dirk Herrmann
- Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Ingo Ruhnke, 2001/03/06
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/03/07
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/03/07
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Keith Wright, 2001/03/08
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/03/08
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Marius Vollmer, 2001/03/08
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/03/08
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Keith Wright, 2001/03/09
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble,
Dirk Herrmann <=
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Keith Wright, 2001/03/11