Re: guile for lisp set

[Mikael Djurfeldt]

Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:

> So, I myself will avoid using local-eval as long as I can and not
> promise that it will always be around.  Others might disagree.

I agree that local-eval shouldn't be part of the standard Guile API.

However, it should stay as a binding for now since it's used in the
debugger when evaluating expressions in local frames.

Maybe we could bunch together that kind of bindings in a special
"reflection" module which is implementation-specific and not
guaranteed to stay constant?