[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Portability testers, please: getting the stack base
From: |
Richard Guenther |
Subject: |
Re: Portability testers, please: getting the stack base |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:59:25 +0200 (CEST) |
On 20 Oct 2000, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Richard Guenther <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Compiling is ok now - even without --with-threads. But unfortunately
> > I get the same oops as on ix86 (which I'll try to debug on ix86 as
> > debugging in IRIX doesnt really work here due to pthreads issues):
>
> Hmm, I get a different oops, the one from your first report. Maybe
> you should compile with --with-threads. Glame seems to be suing
> threads, right?
Yes - but only the master thread uses guile. This seems to work fine,
even starting threads from a guile called c-procedure.
> Anyway, there was indeed a bug in Guile: it did not load the startup
> files when using scm_init_guile instead of scm_boot_guile. Please
> update from CVS and try again.
Everything works fine now :) Good work (didnt test Linux, but if
IRIX is fine, Linux should be anyways...).
> 2000-10-20 Marius Vollmer <address@hidden>
>
> * init.c (scm_init_guile_1, invoke_main_func): Call
> scm_load_startup_files in scm_init_guile_1, not in
> invoke_main_func.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
>
--
Richard Guenther <address@hidden>
WWW: http://www.anatom.uni-tuebingen.de/~richi/
The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/
Re: Portability testers, please: getting the stack base, Richard Guenther, 2000/10/12
Re: Portability testers, please: getting the stack base, Dale P. Smith, 2000/10/12
Re: Portability testers, please: getting the stack base, Richard Guenther, 2000/10/12
Re: Portability testers, please: getting the stack base, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/10/24