[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mutating C binding arguments?
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: mutating C binding arguments? |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:41:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 07:30:13PM +0200, Michael Livshin wrote:
: "Lars J. Aas" <address@hidden> writes:
: > SCM arg1 = ...
: > SCM arg2 = ...
: > gh_call2( gh_lookup("values"), arg1, arg2 );
: >
: > That's good enough for me... :)
:
: if you are serious about this, call `gh_lookup("values")' once when
: initializing your program, keep the result in a global variable and
: use that -- or else things might be slower than you expect them to be.
Are you sure gh_lookup("values") is constant? I'd expect it to change
from invocation to invocation of call-with-values...
Lars J
- mutating C binding arguments?, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/03
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/03
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/05
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/05