|
| From: | Lassi Kortela |
| Subject: | Re: Add internal definitions to derived forms |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:18:42 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 |
That is a better way to write it indeed. clause-body being equal to a lambda body. Thank you.
No problem.Nb. I made an oversight - the section of R7RS with the grammar I quoted says:
"These were derived from rules in the grammar given in chapter 7 by replacing some occurrences of <body> with <tail body>, some occurrences of <expression> with <tail expression>, and some occurrences of <sequence> with <tail sequence>."
So the more general names are <expression>, <sequence>, and <body>.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |