Re: Maintenance and future of Guile

[Olivier Dion]

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, Blake Shaw <blake@nonconstructivism.com> wrote:
> In a situation like this, I would recommend that we form a little
> working group to collectively study the implementation of Guile, and
> with Ludo's suggestions come up with a roadmap for tackling various
> areas of the repo/compiler/infrastructure that need work, which we
> could then divide up among ourselves with each of us creating a
> presentation on our assigned areas, with group hack sessions following
> each bi-weekly (or whatever) presentation. This way we could
> distribute the knowledge aquisicition work in a structured fashion
> while forming a support group for developing a collective
> understanding of the codebase, as a cohort of sorts.

I think that would be a great idea.  Separating the work across our
respective forces would be beneficial to the project.  However, that
would require someone that can organize this workgroup and give it some
inertia and a direction on where to start.

-- 
Olivier Dion
Polymtl