[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logo baseline
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Logo baseline |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jan 2020 00:47:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.1 |
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>> Clearly, Guile is still an extension language, with many great
>> applications (Gnucash, Lepton-EDA, OpenCog, GDB, etc.)
>
> Well, you forgot LilyPond
The one tool that uses Guile while dominating its domain.
> Well, for me, Guile's _the_ extension language for my LilyPond.
>
> It may be more, it may have become more.
> And yes, I used Guile for some other stuff as well.
> Nevertheless, it remains the language to extend LilyPond.
>
> It feels very strange dropping said phrase.
Same for me. That Guile takes effort to make extending easy
distinguishes Guile from all the just-scripting languages out there, and
also from many other Schemes.
Actually I’d love to see Guile become better at this: to make it easier
to deploy an application that uses Guile in a statically compiled
binary.
Basically to generalize what LilyPond is doing.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
- Logo baseline, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Amirouche Boubekki, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Linus Björnstam, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Matt Wette, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Nala Ginrut, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline,
Arne Babenhauserheide <=
- Re: Logo baseline, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/20
Re: Logo baseline, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2020/01/19