[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: landed r7rs support
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: landed r7rs support |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:57:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.1 |
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> not an error to refer to it as such. In any case, it does not seem to
> me that R7RS-large is similar to the other reports in the RnRS series.
> To me it is more similar in flavor to the SRFI process.
R7RS-large seems to me like an effort to build a foundation for mobility
between Schemes. An effort to build a higher level of consistency and
uniformity than what we have in SRFIs, so the system as a whole stays
easier to understand, but with a similar scope as SRFIs, so you can more
easily write substantial applications without resorting to
implementation specific libraries.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature