[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2019 12:09:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 06:54:38PM +0800, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> Hi folks!
> Here's a patch to add current-suspendable-io-status:
> Its result is a pair: (finished-bytes . rest-bytes)
Sorry for this possibly dumb question, but... is there a way
to be non-blocking even if there are no readable/writable
bytes at all? Or would one have to do multi-threading (and
let the single threads [1] block) for that?
Thanks
[1] not necessarily "operating system" threads
-- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Nala Ginrut, 2019/05/13
- Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Nala Ginrut, 2019/05/13
- Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Mark H Weaver, 2019/05/13
- Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Mark H Weaver, 2019/05/13
- Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Nala Ginrut, 2019/05/14
- Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Mark H Weaver, 2019/05/14
- Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Nala Ginrut, 2019/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Mark H Weaver, 2019/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Nala Ginrut, 2019/05/17
- Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter, Mark H Weaver, 2019/05/18
Re: [PATCH] Add current-suspendable-io-status parameter,
tomas <=