[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
What's the alternative of scm_new_port_table_entry?
From: |
Nala Ginrut |
Subject: |
What's the alternative of scm_new_port_table_entry? |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Apr 2018 18:16:38 +0800 |
I found there're many issues after scm_new_port_table_entry was
removed recently:
--------------------------------------------
commit 9417fdb80fb5db4f657c9a329faaa61162ab996b
Author: Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
Date: Fri Feb 16 14:26:56 2018 +0100
doc: Fix typo about SRFI-4 syntax.
Reported by Matt Wette <address@hidden>.
...skipping...
(scm_new_port_table_entry): Remove; not useful.
-------------------------------------------
This breaks me when I'm trying to compile something required it.
And this change seems prevent people compile GDB with guile support:
https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng/issues/718
So what's the alternative of scm_new_port_table_entry to use ?
Best regards.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- What's the alternative of scm_new_port_table_entry?,
Nala Ginrut <=