[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setitimer with Cygwin and Hurd
|
From: |
Mike Gran |
|
Subject: |
Re: setitimer with Cygwin and Hurd |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:31:16 +0000 (UTC) |
>> On Hurd, calls to setitimer and getitimer for the profiling
>> and virtual timers will always fail with ENOSYS.
>> On Cygwin, calls to setitimer and getitimer for the
>> profiling and virtual timers will always fail with EINVAL.
>Is it possible to avoid defining these interfaces if they will never
>work?
>Is that even a good idea? :) Maybe not. Would be better to have
>(defined? 'setitimer) or so. If not, a setitimer feature I guess --
>(provided? 'setitimer).
This is what I came up with
branch wip-itimer-checks
commit f5b362586d7622c408d4402c7cb496c45ffb56e8
What do you think?
-Mike