[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request for feedback on SRFI-126
|
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
|
Subject: |
Re: Request for feedback on SRFI-126 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:20:23 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/3.14.14-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 09:58:32 schrieb Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı /Kammer:
> Exactly, I agree. It should be noted though that some things can be
> implemented purely as portable libraries, so there needn't be a Request
> For Implementations to do it, whereas some other things, which I call
> "fundamental" features, need to be supported by implementations, so they
> need to be in the language specification or an authoritative SRFI.
What is an authoritative SRFI? One which is available in most
implementations?
Best wishes,
Arne
--
1w6 sie zu achten,
sie alle zu finden,
in Spiele zu leiten
und sacht zu verbinden.
→ http://1w6.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.