[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allo
From: |
David Pirotte |
Subject: |
Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:36:05 -0200 |
Hi again,
and, to be very very precise, I even renamed my directory now [which appears in
the
compilation trace] because its previous name was terrible (and terribly wrong)!
so, the appropriate directory name is: .../setter-inheritance-bug
[ the new trace is here below, 'in place'
[ the rest of the text is unchanged
[ and I still pretend it is a bug
Cheers,
David
> ...
> Oh no, it's not working as it should, too bad: this time I cleared my cache
> I did not take care of that carefully enough I guess... anyway, the good news
> is
> that:
>
> I think we still are not talking about _exactly_ the same think here and
> hope that when we do, you will agree;
>
> Indeed please note that in the code of my previous message, the define
> setter on the <b> class _is_ commented: i am sorry if it induced you in
> some sort of misunderstanding, but that line should _not_ even exist
> (that
> was a trick to circumvent till now);
>
> If that line does not exist, then using the setter on a <b> instance
> must
> call/execute the code of the setter defined at superclass level, <a> in
> our
> case. by no mean, it should internally/hiddenly redefine my beautiful
> setter :), in my back, not without talking to me first anyway :)
>
> So, here is the code, without the setter being redefined...:
>
> ;; module a.scm starts here
> (define-module (a)
> #:use-module (oop goops)
> #:export (<a>
> !width))
>
> (define-class <a> ()
> (width #:accessor !width #:init-keyword #:width #:init-value 0))
>
> (define-method ((setter !width) (self <a>) width)
> ;; here comes complex code, computing earth orbit and calling lower
> ;; level clutter internals, such as the <clutter-actor> layout...
> (pk "this is <a> !width setter method, hello!")
> (slot-set! self 'width width))
> ;; module ends here
>
> ;; module b.scm starts here
> (define-module (b)
> #:use-module (oop goops)
> #:use-module (a)
> #:export (<b>)
>
> #:re-export (!width))
>
> (define-class <b> (<a>))
> ;; module ends here
>
> And here is what I get, which is not correct: since I did not redefine
> anything
> at <b> level, the slot and 'associated functionality', the setter in this
> case,
> must be 'fully' inherited: it is the setter I define on <a> that must be
> called
> when being used on any instances, all <a> and <b> instances
>
> [ this time I left the guile version as well), please double check
address@hidden:~/alto/projects/guile-tests/goops/setter-inheritance-bug 21 $
guile
GNU Guile 2.0.11.113-583a
Copyright (C) 1995-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'.
This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details.
Enter `,help' for help.
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (oop goops)
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (b)
;;; note: source file ./b.scm
;;; newer than compiled
/home/david/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-8-2.0/usr/alto/projects/guile-tests/goops/setter-inheritance-bug/b.scm.go
;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
;;; or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable.
;;; compiling ./b.scm
;;; note: source file ./a.scm
;;; newer than compiled
/home/david/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-8-2.0/usr/alto/projects/guile-tests/goops/setter-inheritance-bug/a.scm.go
;;; compiling ./a.scm
;;; compiled
/home/david/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-8-2.0/usr/alto/projects/guile-tests/goops/setter-inheritance-bug/a.scm.go
;;; compiled
/home/david/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-8-2.0/usr/alto/projects/guile-tests/goops/setter-inheritance-bug/b.scm.go
scheme@(guile-user)> (make <b>)
$1 = #<<b> 21b39a0>
scheme@(guile-user)> (!width $1)
$2 = 0
scheme@(guile-user)> (set! (!width $1) 20)
$3 = 20
scheme@(guile-user)>
pgpbXsixZqFua.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, Andy Wingo, 2015/01/26
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, David Pirotte, 2015/01/26
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, Andy Wingo, 2015/01/27
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, David Pirotte, 2015/01/27
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, David Pirotte, 2015/01/27
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, Andy Wingo, 2015/01/27
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, David Pirotte, 2015/01/27
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass,
David Pirotte <=
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, Andy Wingo, 2015/01/28
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, David Pirotte, 2015/01/28
- Re: goops - guile-clutter unexpected bug while using #:virtual slot allocation for a <clutter-actor> subclass, David Pirotte, 2015/01/30