Re: Use GNU standard for displaying backtraces?

[Thompson, David]

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Trying to get Emacs's compilation-mode to support stepping down Guile
> backtraces, I wrote some elisp code to determine the absolute file
> name for incomplete relative files that come from Guile's load path,
> e.g., ice/boot-9.scm.
>

[snip]

> however, I like to step down all lines of a backtrace with
> next-error/previous-error, so haven't done that.

+1 to using the GNU standard.

I can't speak to the quality of the patch, but I have also noticed
that next-error/previous-error didn't work with guile backtraces.  It
would be really useful if it worked.

- Dave