[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in scm_getaffinity
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in scm_getaffinity |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jul 2014 23:04:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130009 (Ma Gnus v0.9) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> skribis:
> While working on the MS-Windows emulation of this function, I bumped
> into something that looks like a bug in its subroutine:
>
> static SCM
> cpu_set_to_bitvector (const cpu_set_t *cs)
> {
> SCM bv;
> size_t cpu;
>
> bv = scm_c_make_bitvector (sizeof (*cs), SCM_BOOL_F);
>
> for (cpu = 0; cpu < sizeof (*cs); cpu++)
> {
> if (CPU_ISSET (cpu, cs))
> /* XXX: This is inefficient but avoids code duplication. */
> scm_c_bitvector_set_x (bv, cpu, SCM_BOOL_T);
> }
>
> I think using 'sizeof (*cs)' is incorrect here, we need to use
> CPU_SETSIZE instead. The cpu_set_t data type could be an array of bit
> masks, in which case counting only bytes in it is wrong: the result is
> too small.
Indeed, good catch. Could you commit the obvious fix?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Re: Windows file name separators, (continued)
- Fix 'dirname' and 'basename' on MS-Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/02
- Re: Fix 'dirname' and 'basename' on MS-Windows, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/07/09
- Re: Fix 'dirname' and 'basename' on MS-Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/09
- Provide reasonable stack limit on MS-Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/02
- Re: Provide reasonable stack limit on MS-Windows, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/07/02
- Re: Provide reasonable stack limit on MS-Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/03
- Bug in scm_getaffinity, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/02
- Re: Bug in scm_getaffinity,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Bug in scm_getaffinity, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/03