[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MinGW vs. setlocale
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: MinGW vs. setlocale |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:16:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130009 (Ma Gnus v0.9) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Doug Evans <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Jun 11, 2014 3:14 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>> >> [...]
>> > UNRESOLVED: i18n.test: string mapping: string-locale-downcase Turkish
>> >
>> > I don't know why these fail.
>>
>> Note that “UNRESOLVED” is not a failure; it means “we can’t run this
>> test here, so skip it.”
>
> Hi.
> At least in GDB, I generally infer UNRESOLVED to mean "action needed"
> (could be test harness bug or some such), whereas if a test can't be run in
> a particular config I see UNSUPPORTED which I infer to mean "no action
> needed".
Yes, that makes sense, but for historical reasons (perhaps a historical
misunderstanding? ;-)), Guile’s test suite has been using “UNRESOLVED”
with the meaning above.
Ludo’.
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, (continued)
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/11
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/12
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/12
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/15
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/21
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/21
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/21
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/21
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/22
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale, Doug Evans, 2014/06/19
- Re: MinGW vs. setlocale,
Ludovic Courtès <=
MinGW vs. c-api.test, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/09
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Neil Jerram, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, David Kastrup, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, dsmich, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/10
Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/10