[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:56:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:05:52 +0100
>> From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
>>
>> On 2014-06-09 20:32, address@hidden wrote:
>> > What’s the name of /dev/null on Windows?
>>
>> NUL
>
> Yes, "nul" case-insensitively.
If I remember correctly, even something like C:\tmp\nul.txt would serve
as null device, though I cannot vouch for this remaining true with
NT-based Windows systems. It was the case for those versions running on
top of MSDOS I'm pretty sure.
--
David Kastrup
MinGW vs. c-api.test, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/09
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Neil Jerram, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, dsmich, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/10
Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/10
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/11
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/11
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/12
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/12
- Re: MinGW vs. c-api.test, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/06/12