Re: Docstring as only form in a function

[Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı /Kammer]

Arne Babenhauserheide <address@hidden> writes:

> What do you think?

I don't have a strong opinion at all, since this feels like a bikesheddy
issue, but I think the current behavior is more preferable.  A lambda
form cannot have an empty body, and having a docstring shouldn't change
that, so I would expect (lambda x "foo") to be either an error, or yield
a constant function.  The former would deviate from the standards and
possibly make some code break (though it's a trivial fix), and is not an
improvement in consistency either since docstrings aren't mandatory.

Taylan