Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:53 +0100
> 
> > Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built
> > without pthreads.
> 
> Because with the patch Doug posted, both the SIGINT thread and GDB’s
> main thread would call libguile.
> 
> A different strategy would need to be used when Guile lacks pthread
> support.

Could you perhaps suggest such a different strategy?