Re: lua branch

[Phil]

Hey guys,

I was just thinking about Guile Lua (and feeling guilty that I never
did finish it). Anyway, I never did make any progress after my 2012
posts. I got a little discouraged while implementing Lua's multiple
values everywhere, to be honest.

By all means, feel free to take over the lua branch. As long as it's
okay with Ludo, Andy, whoever is in charge these days, I think you
should push to it with reckless abandon instead of submitting patches
since it isn't used in guile (yet).

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Ian Price <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ian Price <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> The current issues with lua vs master are as follows
>> 1) <application> has been renamed to <call> on master
>> 2) <sequence> has been replaced with <seq> which is not quite a drop-in
>> 3) while was being compiled into something with improper scoping.
>>
>> I have fixes for these locally. There is just the question of rebase vs
>> merge for bringing the branch up to date. Any preference there?
>
> Sorry, got distracted.
> Is it okay to merge master into lua, and push these three patches?
>
> --
> Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
>
> "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
> the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
>