[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lua branch
From: |
Ian Price |
Subject: |
Re: lua branch |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:27:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Ian Price <address@hidden> writes:
> I don't know much about Lua, but I think I could do the following.
> 1. Fix the lua-lexer failure.
> 2. Disable or fix[1] the variable-arguments functionality.
> 3. Rebase or merge with modern stable or master
> 4. Fix the errors that arise as a result of 3.
The current issues with lua vs master are as follows
1) <application> has been renamed to <call> on master
2) <sequence> has been replaced with <seq> which is not quite a drop-in
3) while was being compiled into something with improper scoping.
I have fixes for these locally. There is just the question of rebase vs
merge for bringing the branch up to date. Any preference there?
--
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
- Re: lua branch,
Ian Price <=