Re: Record type printers for SRFI 45 promises and SRFI 41 streams

[Daniel Hartwig]

On 8 April 2013 07:13, Daniel Hartwig <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 8 April 2013 00:49, Chris K. Jester-Young <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've attached record type printers for SRFI 45 promises and SRFI 41
>> streams. I've tried to make promise-visit more self-documenting with
>> the use of keyword arguments; let me know if you think that's an
>> improvement!
>>
>> Also as discussed with Mark H Weaver, I've currently implemented the
>> format for promises as #<promise => ...> for unevaluated promises, and
>> #<promise = ...> for evaluated ones. Hopefully this is is easy to read
>> and will clearly distinguish between the two types, and still look
>> different from core promises too.

To distinguish from core promises a more explicit tag is preferable,
like srfi-69 uses:

#<srfi-45:promise OBJ-ADDR>

Regards