Re: Extremely high overhead of 'par-map'

[Ludovic Courtès]

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:

> I must say that 'par-map' has shockingly poor performance.
> We really ought to try to improve this.

IMO we must improve futures, not necessarily ‘par-map’ itself, because
lists are not a good data structure for parallel processing anyway (“get
rid of cons” said Steele ;-)).

Ludo’.