Re: Precedence for reader extensions

[Mikael Djurfeldt]

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden> wrote:
> If anyone is afraid about the effect this would have on reader
> performance, it is possible to compile %read-hash-procedures to a
> table of flags indicating exceptions.

But, given the current interface to reader extensions in the form of
an alist in a fluid, such a table would have to be compiled at each
entry to "read"...