Re: Dynamic FFI vs Static FFI (was Re: About Guile crypto support)

[William ML Leslie]

On 13 February 2013 05:24, Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> wrote:
> Okay, but here I'm using "Static FFI" to mean something very different
> than the C API: I'm talking about a pure scheme-based API that would be
> quite similar to the API our current dynamic FFI, except that a lot of
> the work would be done at compilation time (probably during macro
> expansion).

Maybe even something like LuaJIT FFI or python's CFFI - that can parse
C code at compile time to produce the data structures for the dynamic
FFI?

-- 
William Leslie