Re: syntax closures

[Stefan Israelsson Tampe]

Ok, the unsyntax-72 code cannot be cleanly done I think. You really need
to use a reader macro. I leave the code base modding the reader char #.
as before and will simple wait for a a possibility of per port reader
option to be configured
via a library.

/Stefan

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue 22 Jan 2013 17:19, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> > (read-hash-extend #\_ syntax-closure-reader)
>>>
>>> Have you tried having your srfi-72 module export a binding for unsyntax?
>>
>> I would like to use that of cause, but does it mix well with other
>> already written code?
>
> It should work in a modular fashion.  #,foo reads as (unsyntax foo), and
> the meaning of that depends on the binding of unsyntax that is current.
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/