[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wip-cse
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: wip-cse |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:42:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed 25 Apr 2012 16:10, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> I don't think it's useful to run srfi-1 and vlist tests the same number
>> of times when their complexity varies, as in the assoc case.
>
> Right, and the ‘vhash’ bench is too short to draw any sort of conclusion.
>
> Could you try with an appropriate value of ‘--iteration-factor’?
What is an appropriate value? If I did 100, for example, then the
srfi-1 alist test would take 350 seconds.
Why not take this opportunity to adjust the iterations specified in the
benchmarks, as I proposed in my mail "our benchmarking suite"?
We could also make the benchmarking suite automatically set the
iteration-factor to an appropriate value based on the calibration.
WDYT?
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: wip-cse, (continued)
- Re: wip-cse, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/04/16
- Re: wip-cse, Andy Wingo, 2012/04/16
- Re: wip-cse, Andy Wingo, 2012/04/16
- Re: wip-cse, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/04/17
- Re: wip-cse, Andy Wingo, 2012/04/24
- Re: wip-cse, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/04/24
- Re: wip-cse, Andy Wingo, 2012/04/24
- Re: wip-cse, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/04/24
- Re: wip-cse, Andy Wingo, 2012/04/25
- Re: wip-cse, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/04/25
- Re: wip-cse,
Andy Wingo <=