Re: Inclusion of guile-log II

[Stefan Israelsson Tampe]

> Regardless, I’d be reluctant to use (or include in Guile) a logic
> programming system that uses an interface different from that of Kanren,
> because (1) there’s a book explaining that interface, and (2) it’s very
> well thought out, concise, elegant, and powerful.

F.Y.I.

I have now a kanren interface for guile-log, I do not support partially-eval-sgl 
otherwise everything should be in I think.

To use it install guile-log and use
 (use-modules (logic guile-log kanren))

There is some tests carried over from the kanren sources in the test directory.

Have fun!

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Stefan,

Stefan Israelsson Tampe <address@hidden> skribis:

> If you want independence use kanren. For guile this approach is 10x faster
> then kanren
> and 10x slower that a compiled prolog. Previously I thought that kanren has
> a more functional
> fundament and can express amazing things. But i'm now inclined that
> guile-log has a feature
> that are very cool and I will try to explain this feature for the fun of it.

Any idea why there’s such a performance difference?

Regardless, I’d be reluctant to use (or include in Guile) a logic
programming system that uses an interface different from that of Kanren,
because (1) there’s a book explaining that interface, and (2) it’s very
well thought out, concise, elegant, and powerful.

AIUI Guile-Log uses a different interface, right?  What would it take to
implement Kanren’s?

Thanks,
Ludo’.