[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] read-response-body should return received data when any brea
From: |
Ian Price |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] read-response-body should return received data when any break happens |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:37:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Hartwig <address@hidden> writes:
> So this is an interesting start. The idea of buffering the transfer
> is great -- however, it falls short in this implementation because it
> is internal to read-response-body.
The buffering is useless, it's already performed by get-bytevector-n. In
this sense, it is also not internal to read-response-body
> Also, the whole business about passing the partial data out via an
> exception is very messy.
>
> What about also passing a bytevector to read-response-body? The
> exception then only needs to mention how many bytes were read because
> the caller already has access to the bytevector aka the data.
>
> Consider this quick hack:
>
> (define* (read-response-body! r bv #:optional
> (start 0)
> (count (min (bytevector-length bv)
> (response-content-length r))))
> (and count
> (let ((read (get-bytevector-n! (response-port r) bv start count)))
> (if (= read count)
> bv
> (bad-response
> "EOF while reading response body: ~a bytes of ~a (buffer)"
> read count)))))
>
> which has all the features of your solution yet is much smaller and
> puts the caller in more explicit control of the buffering, which opens
> up many scenarios.
Removing the unnecessary buffering also makes it smaller. :P
> For example, reusing the same bytevector and looping over
> read-response-body! saving the results to disk each time. This limits
> the memory use to the size of the bytevector *and* removes the copy
> operation from your implementation (bonus!).
If you wanted to do it that way, it'd be better to pass in the port
directly and cut out the middle man.
--
Ian Price
"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
Re: [PATCH] read-response-body should return received data when any break happens, Ian Price, 2012/03/15