[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abandon lock-based synchronization in favor of STM?
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: Abandon lock-based synchronization in favor of STM? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:58:45 +0100 |
On 24 Feb 2012, at 20:52, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> I posted this link to IRC, but for the benefit of others, here's a paper
> that I highly recommend for anyone interested in a better way to handle
> sychronization and concurrency:
>
> http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/stm/stm.pdf
Also described here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_transactional_memory
Hans