Re: Should we add scm_to_pointer, or just use SCM_POINTER_VALUE?

[Mark H Weaver]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Adding ‘scm_to_pointer’ is nice, but ‘SCM_POINTER_VALUE’ is also meant
> to be public (and should be documented.)

Okay.

> I’m curious: why would one want to use the FFI’s C API?

Apparently he wanted to create a C callback to a Scheme procedure (using
procedure->pointer), but wanted to do the rest from C.

     Mark