Re: Improve `seed->random-state' in stable-2.0?

[Andy Wingo]

Hi Mike,

On Tue 24 Jan 2012 07:08, Mike Gran <address@hidden> writes:

> My beef is with potentially removing the ability to use an integer seed in 
> seed->random-state.  It is useful and common.  Many other languages
> and schemes do it the same way.  Its strengths and limitations are
> indicated in the manual.

Fair points, all.  It was just a suggestion :)  Thanks for the feedback!

> This is orthogonal to the bug in the procedure, though.

Indeed.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/