Re: Names for PEG Functions

[Noah Lavine]

I've run into trouble because of my problems building master. I'll
have to work around that, so it won't happen tonight.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> I haven't thought about the PEG stuff in a long time, but looking
> back, I'm pretty sure I didn't change the names yet. I will try to do
> it tonight (in GMT-5). I agree, it would be great to have the PEG
> stuff finished.
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Wed 04 Jan 2012 19:12, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon 03 Oct 2011 20:21, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> I hate to make more work for people, but I think the PEG module is
>>>> almost ready for merging, and could probably be merged if we resolved
>>>> this names issue. Any other thoughts?
>>>
>>> Have you updated the wip-peg branch?  I don't remember who is waiting
>>> for whom any more, but reviewing the threads, it seems that we generally
>>> agreed on some name changes here.
>>
>> A kind ping here :)  It would be lovely to get the peg stuff in for
>> 2.0.5.
>>
>> Andy
>> --
>> http://wingolog.org/