[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Names for PEG Functions
From: |
Noah Lavine |
Subject: |
Re: Names for PEG Functions |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:54:42 -0500 |
Sorry for the delay.
I haven't thought about the PEG stuff in a long time, but looking
back, I'm pretty sure I didn't change the names yet. I will try to do
it tonight (in GMT-5). I agree, it would be great to have the PEG
stuff finished.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed 04 Jan 2012 19:12, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Mon 03 Oct 2011 20:21, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I hate to make more work for people, but I think the PEG module is
>>> almost ready for merging, and could probably be merged if we resolved
>>> this names issue. Any other thoughts?
>>
>> Have you updated the wip-peg branch? I don't remember who is waiting
>> for whom any more, but reviewing the threads, it seems that we generally
>> agreed on some name changes here.
>
> A kind ping here :) It would be lovely to get the peg stuff in for
> 2.0.5.
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/